Is a Written Constitution the Right Thing for the UK ...

I feel cautious in enforcing a written constitution into our country, I believe the current rights have been stable and a change may seem unnecessary. The current arrangements have served Britain well for centuries, simply by relying on conventions. In my opinion, we should focus our energy on sorting the ever-growing problems affecting our country, rather than over complicating a situation. By not having a written constitution, it allows us to ensure the current laws adapt to changing situations quicker and easier. A Constitution is a set of rules that help govern the country, there are many different types of constitution but the two most commonly known are uncodified and codified. The British constitution has grown over time,†¦show more content†¦As Britain is the only member of the EU without a written constitution, enforcing one could improve the countries stature. As of right now, the UK has a series of conventions, which are not necessary enforced by law. In America and in other countries that employ codified constitutions, Judges tend to resolve disputes on meaning and rights and I believe this could have a crushing affect on our Government perhaps even undermine the power of our Parliament. People may feel uncomfortable knowing judges have the option to overpower their elected politicians if they do not agree on a particular law, they also will not have to answer to Parliament for the decisions they make. â€Å"If it is to survive, a written constitution must be relatively vague, in order to allow it to develop over time. Responsibility for interpreting and reinterpreting the constitution to suit the time would be the responsibility of the Judiciary. This raises a number of difficulties. Judges are not elected, whereas the House of Commons are. Nethertheless, they would have the power to overrule the elected representatives of the people.† Williams (1998, p.16) People may argue about the Judiciary having the main source of power. Concerns are raised about political members in power with the Government now, and that is with the citizens having the option to vote for whom they want as the elected members of differentShow MoreRelatedThe Constitution Of A Country s Government1634 Words   |  7 Pagesstatement itself. Constitution is a set of rules standardising the power and duties of a country s government as well as the rights of its individuals. Currently constitutions come under two key terms; codified and uncodified constitutions. The UK and countries like Israel and New Zealand are a prime example of uncodified constitutions but that is not to say it is unwritten. Uncodified constitution is one that is made up of numerous written sources. Magna Carta , the Bill of Rights , Act of SettlementRead MoreThe Main Features Of The Uk1444 Words   |  6 Pagesquestion is whether or not the UK is in need of a codified constitution. The abse nce of a written constitution is peculiar in Europe , the UK is said to have a complex and comprehensive system of government which regulates the country. The purpose of this essay is to examine the present features of the UK s unwritten constitution in contrast with other European codified constitutions , an argument as to whether the United Kingdom is in need of a codified constitution will be formulated. This willRead MoreWith reference to the source, describe 3 sources of the UK constitution.888 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿PAPER 2 2010 JUNE 1. a: With reference to the source, describe 3 sources of the UK constitution. Common Law: It includes legal principles that have been developed and applied by UK courts, also it is legal precedent made by judges concerning, for example, the 1931 Donoghue v. Stevenson case had important consequences for the definition of the law of negligence. Conventions: Established norms of political behaviour rooted in past experience rather than the law. For example, the Salisbury ConventionRead MoreInternational Law Regulates The Law And Rules Between Multiple States1500 Words   |  6 Pages It’s not enforced by any certain government or particular legislation. An example of this law is the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 (ECHR). Created in 1950 it has 47 members which have signed into this law and abide by it, in regards to human’s rights and freedom. However national laws are used within one particular state. The state will have its own right to create new laws and runs its own legal system. b) Common law is where judges play a more central part to the case. Through timeRead MoreWhat Are the Similarities and Differences Between the Political Systems in U.K and U.S?894 Words   |  4 PagesS. Constitution was being drafted, its writers had the British Parliamentary system to base on. The British system was the system they were used to and had learnt since childhood. However, because the monarchy was one of the main things that the former colonists had rebelled against, any form of monarchy and most forms of concentrated power were avoided. The most fundamental difference between the political system in the U.K and the U.S is the constitution. The United States has a written constitutionRead MoreGermany and the United Kingdom1400 Words   |  6 Pageschoose to run their countries. Both Germany and the United Kingdom are democracies in the world, however they have many differences between the two. Germany has a constitution, simple branches of government, a complicated electoral system, and interactive local government. On the other hand, the United Kingdom has no written constitution, a complex branches of government, an intricate electoral system, and an almost non-existent local government. In simple terms above, it is seen that Germany andRead MoreThe War On Gun Control1296 Words   |  6 Pagesgoing on in the government, and in the general population of the United States. One side of the debate says that guns are a legal right protected by the Second Amendment, and help to keep citizens safe if they are ever attac ked. The other side says that guns are an evil thing, that they are the cause of death and destruction, and they want to infringe on American s rights, and basically negate the entire second amendment. Gun Control is something that would really hurt this nation. If guns are bannedRead MoreParliamentary Sovereignty Is A Constitutional Relic1513 Words   |  7 Pagesa constitutional relic. It has been rendered obsolete, in particular, by the supremacy of EU law and the UK’s statutory recognition of human rights. We should no longer talk about this irrelevant doctrine.’ We can tell that the supremacy of EU law above the parliamentary sovereignty in the context with the UK’s statutory recognition of human rights renders parliament obsolete and relic. And the main motive of this essay is to tell that the EU laws supremacy have brought a rapid change asRead MoreThe Supremacy Of Eu Law1442 Words   |  6 Pages We can tell that the supremacy of EU law above the parliamentary sovereignty in the context with the UK’s statutory recognition of human rights renders parliament obsolete and relic. And the main motive of this essay is to tell that the EU laws supremacy have brought a rapid change as the whole. Some people would like to say that parliament can entangle some few adverse significant which can affect the sovereignty whereas then no one would bother to follow or talk about the irrelevant doctrineRead MoreThe Issue Of The Second Amendment1704 Words   |  7 Pagesas â€Å"gun nuts†, have the firm belief that the Amer ican people have the right to not only carry a gun, but to carry any type of gun that they want, while anti-gun groups want to get rid of the right to carry a gun all together unless that person is a soldier or police officer. The part of the Second Amendment that is quoted by both sides is always â€Å"A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed†. Did you